Neil Miller
-
Deflection vs. Frequency for measuring flexural modulus
The units are gigapascals for flexural modulus on both axes. One calculated from frequency and the other from deflection. They’re within a reasonable range for spruce, just no correlation between the two methods.
-
Deflection vs. Frequency for measuring flexural modulus
I’ve been testing all my top and bracewood to find the best combination of stiffness and density, optimize plate thickness, etc. I started with Nicoletti’s spreadsheet which calculates both stiffness and density, but since I was also testing deflection, I decided to compare the flexural modulus using that method (with the formula from T.…
-
Raising resonant frequencies of a new build
Update: Turns out it’s not impossible to raise the frequencies. Removing the 35g temporary bridge raised the air resonance 2.1 hz and top monopole 2.6 hz, so a lighter bridge could help a bit.
Filling in the scallops on the lower portion of the X-braces by splicing in spruce raised the main resonances 3.7, 8.6 hz respectively, but…
Ian Davlin The Looth Group -
Raising resonant frequencies of a new build
Initial frequency analysis of this D28 copy (done with a temporary 35g bolt-on bridge and the back plate taped on) is VERY LOW. Main air resonance 83.5hz and top monopole 156.6. It’s standard Martin scalloped X-bracing with a torrefied Adirondack top. Since I can still easily access the bracing, I’m thinking of going in and laminating wood…
-
Muted top monopole on this D28 copy is higher than unmuted. I’m wondering if there might be some strange coupling going on. I can’t identify a clear cross dipole and the back is not active, but I think it shows up (220hz) when muted. It’s a sitka top with Gore-style X-bracing (no scalloping).
Glenn Cummins G Cummins Guitars -
Never mind, I just found the answer in Giuliano’s book!
-
What software is this?? In addition to these guidelines, do you have recommendations for software settings we should be using for frequency analysis?
Tim Tibbetts